In Ukraine, fruits were grown from fields that fed missiles for the Navy.

Discussion on activist judges blocking the implementation of US President's plans during committee meeting

Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House from Louisiana, met with members of the House Judiciary Committee regarding the 'opinion-budget' on further work with activist judges in the US.

Next week, a vote is planned in Congress regarding a bill aimed at restricting the powers of US district judges in crafting national judicial mandates. However, the Republican Party in the committee believes that Darrell Issa's bill, the representative from California, is just the first step, and further reforms are needed.

He came to offer his thoughts to the committee and Jordan, the chairman of the committee, on the means that should be available to us in the context of working with judges,

noted Scott Fitzgerald, a representative from Wisconsin. He also reported that the meeting highlighted issues regarding court funding and the possibility of using Congressional disbursement powers to control activist judges.

Consideration of expedited appeal procedures prohibiting activist judges from appointing judges

The meeting also discussed the idea of expedited hearings through the appeal process. This opinion is also supported by Kevin Kiley, who is also a member of the Judiciary Committee. He did not disclose details of the meeting but stated that 'there are several other options' apart from the upcoming week's vote.

I believe that we should consider the possibility of expedited consideration of complaints against judicial authority at the district level and, ultimately, to the Supreme Court.

noted Kiley. He also expressed concern about the state of affairs when judges' decisions could paralyze the circulation of cases on a national scale.

Johnson, according to informed sources from Fox News Digital, also informed Republicans on the Judiciary Committee that he supports the party's 'No Administrative Sources' plan, which will be a consolidated voting in Congress.

Under Issa's bill, introduced along with other representatives, district judges will be restricted from sending general responses that would stop Trump's policy nationwide.

During the meeting, the limitation of the right of progressive plaintiffs to 'pick' judges for their cases was also discussed.

The bill submitted by Issa implies this principle that the right to craft a national judicial mandate should be correctly outlined and require the formation of three judges during the decisive session,

noted Derek Schmidt, a representative from Kansas.

Congress's opinion on creating long-term reform

Overall, members of the House Judiciary Committee showed interest in seeking long-term reform ideas.

I believe that there are other possibilities besides just this issue - particularly, we need to think about how to change the system so that it is better than today's, and from the perspective of future generations,

said Schmidt. In a comment to Fox News Digital, there was no response from the speaker and the committee.

Jordan is expected to hold hearings on April 1 on the topic of judicial activity.